The percentage of battery-electric vehicles was doubled to 20% in the initial $2.98b order for 50,000 vehicles.

The Postal Service is in the process of replacing the ubiquitous delivery trucks that went into service between 19. More than 141,000 of those are the old models that lack safety features like air bags, anti-lock brakes and backup cameras. The Postal ServiceвЂ™s fleet includes 190,000 local delivery vehicles. When itвЂ™s ready for the next batch, I will evaluate,вЂќ he added. I have 30-year-old IT вЂ¦ I have to spend a few billion dollars, at least, to get my plants relevant вЂ¦ I made a decision on this batch. But I would be negligent to spend all my money on doing that.вЂќ In an interview with the Washington Post earlier this year, DeJoy said, вЂњThe policy of electrifying the fleet of the nation is a mission that I will support.

The Postal Service contract calls for 10% of the new vehicles to be electric but the Postal Service contends more electric vehicles can be bought based on financial outlook and strategic considerations. The Postal Service defended its actions, with its spokesperson Kim Frum stating in an email, вЂњThe Postal Service conducted a robust and thorough review and fully complied with all of our obligations under (the National Environmental Policy Act).вЂќ вЂњOnce this purchase goes through, weвЂ™ll be stuck with more than 100,000 new gas-guzzling vehicles on neighborhood streets, serving homes across our state and across the country, for the next 30 years. вЂњThe Postal ServiceвЂ™s improper action will not only needlessly pollute every American community for decades to come, but it will also cost millions more in taxpayer funds and leave the agency vulnerable to fluctuating fuel prices.вЂќД¬alifornia attorney general Rob Bonta said itвЂ™s critical to stop the process before it is too late. He continued, вЂњAstoundingly, the Postal Service signed a contract and paid millions of dollars for these vehicles first, before beginning its environmental analysis to justify its action, in blatant violation of. вЂњThe crux of this case is that the Postal Service performed its analysis too late, and even the analysis it did prepare was incomplete, misleading, and biased against cleaner vehicles,вЂќ Martinez wrote in his complaint reviewed by the Washington Post. The review process вЂњwas so rickety and riddled with error that it failed to meet the basic standards of the National Environmental Policy Act,вЂќ said Adrian Martinez, senior attorney on EarthjusticeвЂ™s Right to Zero campaign.

Attorneys general from 16 states and the District of Columbia filed another suit in the same venue.ДЄnother was filed by the Natural Resources Defense Council and United Auto Workers in New York.ДЄll three of them target the environmental review underpinning of the Postal ServiceвЂ™s planned purchase of up to 165,000 next-generation delivery vehicles over the next decade. One lawsuit was filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, Earthjustice, CleanAirNow KC and Sierra Club in San Francisco. вЂњLouis DeJoyвЂ™s gas-guzzling fleet guarantees decades of pollution with every postcard and package,вЂќ said Scott Hochberg, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, referring to the postmaster general. Plaintiffs contend that buying fossil fuel-powered delivery vehicles will cause environmental harm for decades to come.

Postal 2 critical error